post-scarcity economy
A hypothetical economy where machines and AI produce so cheaply that most basic goods and services are abundantly available to almost everyone.
In plain terms
Economics starts from the premise that most things are scarcer than people want: time, labor, and raw materials are finite, so almost everything has a price. The post-scarcity economy refers to a future vision where this starting point no longer applies to most goods, because production is carried out almost entirely by machines, robots, and AI agents at very low cost.
Think of tap water or Wikipedia. They are not infinite and not made for free, yet they are so cheap and abundant that you do not count how much you use. The vision is that the same would happen with food, energy, clothing, medical diagnosis, or education.
This is not a ready-made plan or forecast, but a framework for thinking. It is useful for asking: if machines perform most of the work, how do people earn a living, who owns the profits, and what gives meaning to our days?
It differs from simple prosperity in that people do not earn more, but goods become so cheap that living no longer depends on paid work.
How it works
- The vision is that automation will drive down costs: robots will handle an increasing share of physical work, and AI agents will handle an increasing share of intellectual work, so producing another unit or service will cost almost nothing.
- Energy and raw materials will become abundant: the vision assumes cheap, clean energy and efficient recycling, because without these, manufacturing will remain expensive.
- The vision is that the price of basic goods will approach zero. In the digital world, this has partly already happened with music, maps, or encyclopedias, because copying costs almost nothing; for physical products, however, materials and energy are always required, making this far more difficult.
- Distribution must be regulated anew: if paid work decreases, income must reach people through other channels, such as basic income, community ownership, or free basic services.
- What remains scarce remains valuable: seaside property, human attention, reputation, or an original painting cannot be multiplied, and competition for these continues.
An everyday example
A few decades ago, a series of encyclopedias cost several months' savings; today, you can access a vast, continuously updated knowledge base for free on your phone. Advocates of the post-scarcity economy believe AI can do the same for legal advice, language teaching, or medical screening. When a tech CEO promises an 'era of abundance' in an interview, they refer to this future vision.
Who is affected
A common misconception
Limits and risks
- This is a vision, not a fact: no one knows if or when it will happen, so treat confident deadlines cautiously.
- Technical abundance does not mean fair distribution: if machines and AI models are in the hands of a few, inequality can grow even alongside cheap production.
- Physical limits remain, because energy, raw materials, arable land and environmental capacity are finite.
- The term is often used in marketing to distract from current workplace and societal costs with promises of future abundance.
Similar, but not the same
- Universal basic income – Basic income is a specific distribution tool that can be implemented today, while the post-scarcity economy is a vision of an entire economic era.
- technological unemployment – This refers to job loss due to automation, meaning the risky side of the same process, not the promise of abundance.
- Technological singularity – The singularity refers to the explosive development of machine intelligence, while the post-scarcity economy is one of its possible economic consequences.
Related concepts
futures studies, automation, the economic impact of AI
fully automated production, zero marginal cost
Universal basic income, technological unemployment, general AI, Technological singularity, agent economy, superintelligence
A brief history
One of the best-known early formulations of the idea is John Maynard Keynes's 1930 essay, Economic Possibilities for Our Grandchildren, which argues that technical progress could solve the problem of livelihood within a hundred years. The term "post-scarcity" itself spread in the late 1960s and early 1970s, partly due to Murray Bookchin's 1971 essay collection, Post-Scarcity Anarchism. It became widely known through science fiction literature and film, such as the Star Trek series produced from the late 1980s and Iain M. Banks's Culture novels starting in 1987. The AI boom in the 2020s brought it back into public discourse.
Where things stand
By the end of 2026, this remains a vision: while some digital goods have indeed become almost free, food, housing, and energy remain scarce and expensive for many. AI company leaders often refer to it, but many economists are skeptical about the timing and distribution.
Also known as
post-scarcity economy · post-scarcity economy · post-scarcity society · economy of abundance · age of abundance · post-scarcity · post-scarcity economy · age of abundance
Sources
This entry was machine-edited and has undergone machine expert review; the “In the news” section updates automatically from Agent Age stories.